RESUMEN
Perforating globe injury is the leading cause of monocular blindness and vision loss. A 58-year-old male was injured by acupuncture needle during acupuncture treatment for his cerebral infarction. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first case report of perforating injury of the eyeball and traumatic cataract caused by acupuncture. The patient was hospitalized due to diagnosis of perforating ocular injury, traumatic cataract, and corneal and iris perforating injury. Moreover, he had to accept treatments of phacoemulsification, anterior vitrectomy along with intraocular lens implantation in the sulcus to improve his visual acuity. As acupuncture therapy has been widely performed for various diseases and achieved highly approval, the aim of this report is to remind acupuncturists operating accurately to avoid unnecessary injury during the treatment process, or the cure can also become the weapon.
Asunto(s)
Terapia por Acupuntura/efectos adversos , Catarata/etiología , Lesiones de la Cornea/etiología , Lesiones Oculares Penetrantes/etiología , Traumatismo Múltiple , Lesiones por Pinchazo de Aguja/etiología , Segmento Anterior del Ojo/diagnóstico por imagen , Segmento Anterior del Ojo/lesiones , Catarata/diagnóstico , Lesiones de la Cornea/diagnóstico , Lesiones Oculares Penetrantes/diagnóstico , Humanos , Enfermedad Iatrogénica , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Lesiones por Pinchazo de Aguja/diagnóstico , Ultrasonografía Doppler en ColorRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Extensive conjunctival scarring is common after severe chemical and thermal eye burns. There is often not enough healthy conjunctiva from the other eye available to correct the symblepharons, therefore other autologous tissues have to be transplanted. PATIENTS AND METHODS: From February 1992 until March 1993 13 patients were treated with free nasal mucosal grafts from the inferior turbinates for reconstruction of the fornices. The newly created deep fornices were secured by a silicone band. In 3 patients an Illig plastic shell was used additionally. The surgical treatment was supplemented with an intensive treatment with topical corticosteroids to decrease the inflammatory reaction. RESULTS: The patients were followed for an average of 7-18 months. The interval between the accident and the transplantation ranged from 2-26 months. In 10 patients a reconstruction of the fornices was achieved. In all patients, however, some slight scars could be observed. Postoperative Schirmertest was markedly improved. These results encourage us to plan a penetrating keratoplasty in 7 cases. 3 patients showed a recurrence of the symblepharon 2 months after the transplantation. CONCLUSION: The nasal mucosa graft material is best suited for repair of extensive symblepharon. The advantages of this tissue are the availability of large pieces of mucosa and the transplantation of intraepithelial goblet-cells. Long-term effects are the improvement and stabilisation of the tear film.